Wednesday, May 10, 2006

Pay Scale Fiasco

This exchange resulted from Nick bringing our current pay scales to Fridays meeting and pointing out that they wern't the same !

If you read between the lines it looks like Mr Moore has had some explaining to do to senior management ! please not that the proposed grading structure certainly hasn't been agreed yet

Dear Peter

Thanks. The pay scale attached to the Framework paper is the new 51 point pay spine which we'll be using wef 1.8.06, transferring staff from our current 92-point pay spine. By copy, I'm asking Patricia to send you a information containing the current 92 pay spine with our current grading structure and how it maps against the 51-point spine and the proposed grading structure.

Regards.

Mike


Agreed!

Mike - can you clarify asap, thanks

Alan

Notwithstanding whether we agree or not with the proposed grading structures contained in your paper on the Implementation of the Framework Agreement, it would greatly help if we could work to a consistent pay scale and grade points. Checking on the Personnel Services website, there is no correspondence between the pay scale for support staff and that for academic staff either in terms of the salary figures or in terms of the grade points. And the salary scale and grade points in your model grading structure in turn differs from both. Can you clarify the situation, please?

Peter Mottershead
NATFHE

No comments: